ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"
31.5" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM94 PPI #65
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"140 PPI #30
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM300 nits #65
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"600 nits #22
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM220 Hz
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"120 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: advantage Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" — At 65cm, the Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" is retina (140 PPI) while the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM is not — you need to sit at least 93cm away for pixel-free viewing.
- Brightness: advantage Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" — The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" is 50% brighter in SDR (450 vs 300 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 600 vs 300 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM | Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 220 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 110% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% |
| Screen Size | 29.5" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 2560×1080 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 94 | 140 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 93cm | 62cm |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 300 nits | 600 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:3,000 |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 15 W | 140 W |
| Year | 2022 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 | Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 29.5" | 31.5" (Better) |
| Resolution | 2560×1080 | 3840×2160 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 94 | 140 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 93cm | 62cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 220 Hz (Better) | 120 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium | None |
| Response Time | 1 ms GTG (Better) | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR 600 |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 450 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 300 nits | 600 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:3,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 15 W | 140 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 110% (Better) | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% |
| Year | 2022 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32"?
The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" has 140 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" requires 62cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 · 94 PPI · 29.5" · 220 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 120 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 · 94 PPI · 29.5" · 220 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 32" 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 120 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: