Skip to content

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5" · 2560×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm
Open in calculator →

Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"

27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025
Screen Size 29.5" (Better) 27"
Resolution 2560×1080 5120×2880 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 94 218 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 220 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium G-SYNC Compatible
Response Time 1 ms GTG (Better) 8 ms GTG
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 300 nits 350 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 300 nits 350 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:2,000 (Better)
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 15 W 90 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 110% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100%
Year 2022 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM offers a larger 29.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"?
The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" has 218 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" requires 40cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons