Skip to content

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Samsung Odyssey G9 49"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5" · 2560×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung Odyssey G9 49"

48.7" · 5120×1440 · VA
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 Samsung Odyssey G9 49" 2020
Screen Size 29.5" 48.7" (Better)
Resolution 2560×1080 5120×1440 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 94 109 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm 80cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS VA
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 32:9
Refresh Rate 220 Hz 240 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 1 ms GTG 1 ms GTG
HDR Certification None DisplayHDR 1000
SDR Brightness 300 nits 420 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 300 nits 1000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:2,500 (Better)
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 15 W
Color Gamut sRGB 110% (Better) sRGB 125% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 92%
Year 2022 (Better) 2020

Summary

The Samsung Odyssey G9 49" has higher pixel density (109 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Samsung Odyssey G9 49" allows sitting closer (80cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Samsung Odyssey G9 49" offers a larger 48.7" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Samsung Odyssey G9 49"?
The Samsung Odyssey G9 49" has 109 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung Odyssey G9 49" requires 80cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons