Alienware AW3225QF 32" vs Samsung Odyssey G9 49"
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Alienware AW3225QF 32"
31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
Alienware AW3225QF 32"139 PPI #41
Samsung Odyssey G9 49"109 PPI #55
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
Alienware AW3225QF 32"1000 nits #7
Samsung Odyssey G9 49"1000 nits #7
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
Alienware AW3225QF 32"98% #31
Samsung Odyssey G9 49"95% #48
79%100%
Refresh Rate
Alienware AW3225QF 32"240 Hz
Samsung Odyssey G9 49"240 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: advantage Alienware AW3225QF 32" — At 65cm, the Alienware AW3225QF 32" is retina (139 PPI) while the Samsung Odyssey G9 49" is not — you need to sit at least 80cm away for pixel-free viewing.
- Brightness: advantage Samsung Odyssey G9 49" — The Samsung Odyssey G9 49" is 62% brighter in SDR (420 vs 260 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 1000 vs 1000 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | Alienware AW3225QF 32" | Samsung Odyssey G9 49" |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 5120×1440 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 139 | 109 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 63cm | 80cm |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG | 1 ms GTG |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 | 1:2,500 |
| Year | 2024 | 2020 |
| Screen Size | 31.6" | 48.7" |
| SDR Brightness | 260 nits | 420 nits |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 97% | sRGB 125% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 92% |
All specifications
| Specification | Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 | Samsung Odyssey G9 49" 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.6" | 48.7" (Better) |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 (Better) | 5120×1440 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 139 (Better) | 109 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 63cm (Better) | 80cm |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | VA |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 32:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | G-SYNC Compatible | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) | 1 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 1000 |
| SDR Brightness | 260 nits | 420 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000,000 (Better) | 1:2,500 |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 1x HDMI · 2x DP · USB Hub |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 97% | sRGB 125% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 92% (Better) |
| Year | 2024 (Better) | 2020 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Alienware AW3225QF 32" or Samsung Odyssey G9 49"?
The Alienware AW3225QF 32" has 139 PPI compared to 109 PPI for the Samsung Odyssey G9 49".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Alienware AW3225QF 32" requires 63cm vs 80cm for the Samsung Odyssey G9 49" to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Samsung Odyssey G9 49" 2020 · 109 PPI · 48.7" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs AOC U27G4R 27" 2024 · 163 PPI · 27" · 160 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Apple Pro Display XDR 32" 2019 · 216 PPI · 32" · 60 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: