Skip to content

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5" · 2560×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm
Open in calculator →

Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K

27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K 2023
Screen Size 29.5" (Better) 27"
Resolution 2560×1080 5120×2880 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 94 218 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 21:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 220 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium None
Response Time 1 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 300 nits 600 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 300 nits 600 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:1,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 0x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 15 W 90 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 110% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 94%
Year 2022 2023 (Better)

Summary

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM offers a larger 29.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K has 218 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K requires 40cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons