ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34"
33.94" · 3440×1440 · OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"
27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34"110 PPI #47
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"218 PPI #5
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34"1300 nits #3
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"350 nits #61
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34"99% #2
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"100% #1
79%100%
Refresh Rate
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34"240 Hz
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"60 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: advantage Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" — At 65cm, the Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" is retina (218 PPI) while the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" is not — you need to sit at least 80cm away for pixel-free viewing.
- Brightness: advantage Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" — The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" is 30% brighter in SDR (350 vs 270 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 350 vs 1300 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" | Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 33.94" | 27" |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG | 8 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1300 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 | 1:2,000 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 135% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% |
| Resolution | 3440×1440 | 5120×2880 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 110 | 218 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 80cm | 40cm |
| SDR Brightness | 270 nits | 350 nits |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" 2024 | Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 33.94" (Better) | 27" |
| Resolution | 3440×1440 | 5120×2880 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 110 | 218 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 80cm | 40cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | OLED | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz (Better) | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) | 8 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 270 nits | 350 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1300 nits (Better) | 350 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 (Better) | 1:2,000 |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 90 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 135% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 95% (Better) | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" or Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"?
The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" has 218 PPI compared to 110 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" requires 40cm vs 80cm for the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" 2024 · 110 PPI · 33.94" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM 34" 2024 · 110 PPI · 33.94" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: