Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 vs BenQ PD2725U 27"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

BenQ PD2725U 27"

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 BenQ PD2725U 27" 2021
Screen Size 31.5" (Better) 27"
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 163 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm 54cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 500 DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 300 nits (Better) 250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 400 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:1,200
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W (Better) 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 95% · Adobe RGB 100%
Year 2025 (Better) 2021

Summary

The BenQ PD2725U 27" has higher pixel density (163 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The BenQ PD2725U 27" allows sitting closer (54cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 or BenQ PD2725U 27"?
The BenQ PD2725U 27" has 163 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The BenQ PD2725U 27" requires 54cm vs 62cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons