ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 vs BenQ RD280U
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3
31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3140 PPI #30
BenQ RD280U164 PPI #18
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM31000 nits #7
BenQ RD280U400 nits #51
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM399% #2
BenQ RD280U93% #59
79%100%
Refresh Rate
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3240 Hz
BenQ RD280U60 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: no visible difference — Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 65cm. The BenQ RD280U has 15% higher pixel density (164 vs 140 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 53cm.
- Brightness: advantage ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 — Similar SDR brightness (300 vs 350 nits), but the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 leads in HDR peak (1000 vs 400 nits).
Key Differences
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 | BenQ RD280U |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" | 28.2" |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 | 1:1,200 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 93% · Adobe RGB 87% |
| Year | 2025 | 2024 |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2560 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 140 | 164 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 62cm | 53cm |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 350 nits |
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 | BenQ RD280U 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" (Better) | 28.2" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2560 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 140 | 164 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 62cm | 53cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz (Better) | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium Pro | None |
| Response Time | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR True Black 500 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 350 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits (Better) | 400 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500,000 (Better) | 1:1,200 |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 90 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 93% · Adobe RGB 87% |
| Year | 2025 (Better) | 2024 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 or BenQ RD280U?
The BenQ RD280U has 164 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The BenQ RD280U requires 53cm vs 62cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ RD280U 2024 · 164 PPI · 28.2" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ RD280U 2024 · 164 PPI · 28.2" · 60 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: