Skip to content

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 vs Huawei MateView

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3

31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →

Huawei MateView

28.2" · 3840×2560 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →
Specification ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 2025 Huawei MateView 2021
Screen Size 31.5" (Better) 28.2"
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2560 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 140 164 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm 53cm (Better)
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 3:2
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro None
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 8 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 500 DisplayHDR 400
SDR Brightness 300 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 600 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,500,000 (Better) 1:1,200
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W (Better) 65 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 93%
Year 2025 (Better) 2021

Summary

The Huawei MateView has higher pixel density (164 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Huawei MateView allows sitting closer (53cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 or Huawei MateView?
The Huawei MateView has 164 PPI compared to 140 PPI for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Huawei MateView requires 53cm vs 62cm for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons