BenQ MA270UP vs Kuycon G27P
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Advantages of BenQ MA270UP
| Specification | BenQ MA270UP | Kuycon G27P |
|---|---|---|
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 8 ms GTG |
Advantages of Kuycon G27P
| Specification | BenQ MA270UP | Kuycon G27P |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 5120×2880 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 163 | 218 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 54cm | 40cm |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz |
| SDR Brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,200 | 1:2,000 |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% |
Identical
| Specification | BenQ MA270UP | Kuycon G27P |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 27" |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | FreeSync |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 400 | None |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Summary
Sharpness: no visible difference
Both screens exceed the retina threshold at 65cm. The Kuycon G27P has 25% higher pixel density (218 vs 163 PPI), but this only becomes visible below 40cm.
Brightness: advantage Kuycon G27P
The Kuycon G27P is 33% brighter in SDR (600 vs 450 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 600 vs 450 nits.
All specifications
| Specification | BenQ MA270UP 2025 | Kuycon G27P 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 5120×2880 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 163 | 218 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 54cm | 40cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | FreeSync |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG (Better) | 8 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 400 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,200 | 1:2,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% (Better) |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: BenQ MA270UP or Kuycon G27P?
The Kuycon G27P has 218 PPI compared to 163 PPI for the BenQ MA270UP.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon G27P requires 40cm vs 54cm for the BenQ MA270UP to reach retina quality.
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated:
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ MA270UP 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon G27P 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 75 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ MA270UP 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon G27P 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 75 Hz