Skip to content

BenQ MA270UP vs Kuycon G32P

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

BenQ MA270UP

27" · 3840×2160 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm
Open in calculator →

Kuycon G32P

31.5" · 6144×3456 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 39cm
Open in calculator →
Specification BenQ MA270UP 2025 Kuycon G32P 2025
Screen Size 27" 31.5" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2160 6144×3456 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 163 224 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 54cm 39cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None FreeSync
Response Time 5 ms GTG 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 None
SDR Brightness 450 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 450 nits 500 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,200 1:2,000 (Better)
Ports 2x HDMI · 0x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 100 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% (Better)
Year 2025 2025

Summary

The Kuycon G32P has higher pixel density (224 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Kuycon G32P allows sitting closer (39cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Kuycon G32P offers a larger 31.5" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: BenQ MA270UP or Kuycon G32P?
The Kuycon G32P has 224 PPI compared to 163 PPI for the BenQ MA270UP.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon G32P requires 39cm vs 54cm for the BenQ MA270UP to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons