BenQ PD2730S vs Kuycon G27P
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
BenQ PD2730S218 PPI #5
Kuycon G27P218 PPI #5
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
BenQ PD2730S400 nits #51
Kuycon G27P600 nits #22
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
BenQ PD2730S98% #31
Kuycon G27P99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
BenQ PD2730S60 Hz
Kuycon G27P75 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 65cm with identical pixel density (218 PPI). No difference in sharpness.
- Brightness: advantage Kuycon G27P — The Kuycon G27P is 50% brighter in SDR (600 vs 400 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 600 vs 400 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | BenQ PD2730S | Kuycon G27P |
|---|---|---|
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 8 ms GTG |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | BenQ PD2730S 2024 | Kuycon G27P 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 5120×2880 | 5120×2880 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 218 | 218 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 40cm | 40cm |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | FreeSync |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG (Better) | 8 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 400 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:2,000 | 1:2,000 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: BenQ PD2730S or Kuycon G27P?
Both have 218 PPI.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 40cm for retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ PD2730S 2024 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon G27P 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 75 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ PD2730S 2024 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon G27P 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 75 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: