BenQ RD280U vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED
26.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
BenQ RD280U164 PPI #18
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED166 PPI #16
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
BenQ RD280U400 nits #51
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED1000 nits #7
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
BenQ RD280U93% #59
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
BenQ RD280U60 Hz
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED240 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 65cm. With nearly identical pixel density (164 vs 166 PPI), there is no visible difference in sharpness.
- Brightness: advantage BenQ RD280U — The BenQ RD280U is 40% brighter in SDR (350 vs 250 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 400 vs 1000 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | BenQ RD280U | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 28.2" | 26.5" |
| Resolution | 3840×2560 | 3840×2160 |
| SDR Brightness | 350 nits | 250 nits |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 164 | 166 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 1000 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,200 | 1:1,500,000 |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 98 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 93% · Adobe RGB 87% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | BenQ RD280U 2024 | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 28.2" (Better) | 26.5" |
| Resolution | 3840×2560 (Better) | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 164 | 166 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 53cm | 53cm |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 3:2 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 350 nits (Better) | 250 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 1000 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,200 | 1:1,500,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 98 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 93% · Adobe RGB 87% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% (Better) |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: BenQ RD280U or MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED?
The MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED has 166 PPI compared to 164 PPI for the BenQ RD280U.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 53cm for retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ RD280U 2024 · 164 PPI · 28.2" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 2025 · 166 PPI · 26.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ RD280U 2024 · 164 PPI · 28.2" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 2025 · 166 PPI · 26.5" · 240 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: