Skip to content

Huawei MateView SE vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Huawei MateView SE

23.8" · 1920×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 94cm
Open in calculator →

Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"

27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Huawei MateView SE 2022 Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025
Screen Size 23.8" 27" (Better)
Resolution 1920×1080 5120×2880 (Better)
Pixel Density (PPI) 93 218 (Better)
Optimal Viewing Distance 94cm 40cm (Better)
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 75 Hz (Better) 60 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync G-SYNC Compatible
Response Time 5 ms GTG (Better) 8 ms GTG
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 250 nits 350 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 600 nits (Better) 350 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000 1:2,000 (Better)
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 80% sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% (Better)
Year 2022 2025 (Better)

Summary

The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" has higher pixel density (218 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" allows sitting closer (40cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" offers a larger 27" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Huawei MateView SE or Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"?
The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" has 218 PPI compared to 93 PPI for the Huawei MateView SE.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" requires 40cm vs 94cm for the Huawei MateView SE to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons