Huawei MateView SE vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"
31.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 62cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
Huawei MateView SE93 PPI #66
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"140 PPI #30
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
Huawei MateView SE600 nits #22
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"1000 nits #7
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
Huawei MateView SE90% #60
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
Huawei MateView SE75 Hz
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"240 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: advantage MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" — At 65cm, the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" is retina (140 PPI) while the Huawei MateView SE is not — you need to sit at least 94cm away for pixel-free viewing.
- Brightness: advantage MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" — Similar SDR brightness (250 vs 250 nits), but the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" leads in HDR peak (1000 vs 600 nits).
Key Differences
| Specification | Huawei MateView SE | MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 23.8" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 93 | 140 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 94cm | 62cm |
| Refresh Rate | 75 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | 1000 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,500,000 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 80% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% |
| Year | 2022 | 2024 |
All specifications
| Specification | Huawei MateView SE 2022 | MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 23.8" | 31.5" (Better) |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 | 3840×2160 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 93 | 140 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 94cm | 62cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 75 Hz | 240 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 250 nits | 250 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | 1000 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,500,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | — | 90 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 80% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 96% (Better) |
| Year | 2022 | 2024 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Huawei MateView SE or MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32"?
The MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" has 140 PPI compared to 93 PPI for the Huawei MateView SE.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" requires 62cm vs 94cm for the Huawei MateView SE to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Huawei MateView SE 2022 · 93 PPI · 23.8" · 75 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Huawei MateView SE 2022 · 93 PPI · 23.8" · 75 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED 32" 2024 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: