Kuycon P32K vs Kuycon Q32S
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
Kuycon P32K140 PPI #30
Kuycon Q32S140 PPI #30
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
Kuycon P32K500 nits #42
Kuycon Q32S1000 nits #7
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut
Kuycon Q32S99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
Kuycon P32K144 Hz
Kuycon Q32S240 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 65cm with identical pixel density (140 PPI). No difference in sharpness.
- Brightness: advantage Kuycon P32K — The Kuycon P32K is 100% brighter in SDR (500 vs 250 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 500 vs 1000 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | Kuycon P32K | Kuycon Q32S |
|---|---|---|
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits | 250 nits |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,500,000 |
All specifications
| Specification | Kuycon P32K 2025 | Kuycon Q32S 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 140 | 140 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 62cm | 62cm |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | G-SYNC Compatible | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 500 nits (Better) | 250 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,500,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 100 W | 100 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 99% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Kuycon P32K or Kuycon Q32S?
Both have 140 PPI.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 62cm for retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon P32K 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 144 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon Q32S 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon P32K 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 144 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon Q32S 2025 · 140 PPI · 31.5" · 240 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: