Skip to content

Hisense U8QG 65" vs TCL QM8 65"

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Hisense U8QG 65"

65" · 3840×2160 · Mini-LED
Optimal Viewing Distance 1.3m
Open in calculator →

TCL QM8 65"

65" · 3840×2160 · Mini-LED
Optimal Viewing Distance 1.3m
Open in calculator →

Category Ranking

Pixel Density (PPI)28in category
Hisense U8QG 65"68 PPI #8
TCL QM8 65"68 PPI #8
57 PPI118 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness28in category
Hisense U8QG 65"3100 nits #3
TCL QM8 65"5000 nits #1
677 nits5000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut28in category
Hisense U8QG 65"97% #15
TCL QM8 65"97% #15
94%100%
Refresh Rate
Hisense U8QG 65"165 Hz
TCL QM8 65"120 Hz
StandardHighUltra

Summary

  • Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 250cm with identical pixel density (68 PPI). No difference in sharpness.
  • Brightness: advantage TCL QM8 65" — The TCL QM8 65" is 71% brighter in SDR (1364 vs 800 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 5000 vs 3100 nits.

Key Differences

Specification Hisense U8QG 65" TCL QM8 65"
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Contrast Ratio 1:7,300 1:5,000
Year 2025 2024
Response Time 6 ms GTG 3 ms GTG
SDR Brightness 800 nits 1364 nits
HDR Peak Brightness 3100 nits 5000 nits
All specifications
Specification Hisense U8QG 65" 2025 TCL QM8 65" 2024
Screen Size 65" 65"
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Pixel Density (PPI) 68 68
Optimal Viewing Distance 1.3m 1.3m
Panel Type Mini-LED Mini-LED
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Refresh Rate 165 Hz (Better) 120 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium Pro
Response Time 6 ms GTG 3 ms GTG (Better)
HDR Certification None None
SDR Brightness 800 nits 1364 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 3100 nits 5000 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:7,300 (Better) 1:5,000
Ports 3x HDMI · USB-C 4x HDMI
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 97% · Adobe RGB 90% sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 97% · Adobe RGB 90%
Year 2025 (Better) 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Hisense U8QG 65" or TCL QM8 65"?
Both have 68 PPI.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 1.3m for retina quality.
Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated: