ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs BenQ MA270UP
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM
| Specification | ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM | BenQ MA270UP |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 29.5" | 27" |
| Refresh Rate | 220 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 110% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% |
Advantages of BenQ MA270UP
| Specification | ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM | BenQ MA270UP |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560×1080 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 94 | 163 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 93cm | 54cm |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 300 nits | 450 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,200 |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 15 W | 90 W |
| Year | 2022 | 2025 |
Identical
| Specification | ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM | BenQ MA270UP |
|---|---|---|
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium | None |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub |
Summary
Sharpness: advantage BenQ MA270UP
At 65cm, the BenQ MA270UP is retina (163 PPI) while the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM is not — you need to sit at least 93cm away for pixel-free viewing.
Brightness: advantage BenQ MA270UP
The BenQ MA270UP is 50% brighter in SDR (450 vs 300 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 450 vs 300 nits.
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 | BenQ MA270UP 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 29.5" (Better) | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560×1080 | 3840×2160 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 94 | 163 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 93cm | 54cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 220 Hz (Better) | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync Premium | None |
| Response Time | 1 ms GTG (Better) | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 300 nits | 450 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 300 nits | 450 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,200 (Better) |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 15 W | 90 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 110% (Better) | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 95% |
| Year | 2022 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or BenQ MA270UP?
The BenQ MA270UP has 163 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The BenQ MA270UP requires 54cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated:
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 · 94 PPI · 29.5" · 220 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ MA270UP 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022 · 94 PPI · 29.5" · 220 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ MA270UP 2025 · 163 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz