BenQ PD2730S vs Kuycon G32P
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
BenQ PD2730S218 PPI #5
Kuycon G32P224 PPI #1
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
BenQ PD2730S400 nits #51
Kuycon G32P500 nits #42
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
BenQ PD2730S98% #31
Kuycon G32P99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
BenQ PD2730S60 Hz
Kuycon G32P60 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 65cm. With nearly identical pixel density (218 vs 224 PPI), there is no visible difference in sharpness.
- Brightness: advantage Kuycon G32P — The Kuycon G32P is 25% brighter in SDR (500 vs 400 nits), a noticeable difference for outdoor readability. HDR peak: 500 vs 400 nits.
Key Differences
| Specification | BenQ PD2730S | Kuycon G32P |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 5120×2880 | 6144×3456 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 218 | 224 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 40cm | 39cm |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | BenQ PD2730S 2024 | Kuycon G32P 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27" | 31.5" (Better) |
| Resolution | 5120×2880 | 6144×3456 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 218 | 224 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 40cm | 39cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | FreeSync |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 5 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 400 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits (Better) |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:2,000 | 1:2,000 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 90 W | 100 W (Better) |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% | sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 99% |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: BenQ PD2730S or Kuycon G32P?
The Kuycon G32P has 224 PPI compared to 218 PPI for the BenQ PD2730S.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Kuycon G32P requires 39cm vs 40cm for the BenQ PD2730S to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs BenQ PD2730S 2024 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Kuycon G32P 2025 · 224 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs BenQ PD2730S 2024 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Kuycon G32P 2025 · 224 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: