Skip to content

BenQ RD280U vs Kuycon Q34W

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

BenQ RD280U

28.2" · 3840×2560 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →

Kuycon Q34W

34" · 3440×1440 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 80cm
Open in calculator →
Specification BenQ RD280U 2024 Kuycon Q34W 2025
Screen Size 28.2" 34" (Better)
Resolution 3840×2560 (Better) 3440×1440
Pixel Density (PPI) 164 (Better) 110
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm (Better) 80cm
Panel Type IPS IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 3:2 21:9
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 165 Hz (Better)
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) None G-SYNC Compatible
Response Time 5 ms GTG 5 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR 400 None
SDR Brightness 350 nits 500 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 400 nits 500 nits (Better)
Contrast Ratio 1:1,200 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 90 W 100 W (Better)
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 93% · Adobe RGB 87% sRGB 99% · DCI-P3 96% (Better)
Year 2024 2025 (Better)

Summary

The BenQ RD280U has higher pixel density (164 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The BenQ RD280U allows sitting closer (53cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Kuycon Q34W offers a larger 34" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: BenQ RD280U or Kuycon Q34W?
The BenQ RD280U has 164 PPI compared to 110 PPI for the Kuycon Q34W.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The BenQ RD280U requires 53cm vs 80cm for the Kuycon Q34W to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons