Huawei MateView SE vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED
26.5" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 53cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
Huawei MateView SE93 PPI #66
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED166 PPI #16
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
Huawei MateView SE600 nits #22
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED1000 nits #7
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
Huawei MateView SE90% #60
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED99% #2
79%100%
Refresh Rate
Huawei MateView SE75 Hz
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED240 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: advantage MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED — At 65cm, the MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED is retina (166 PPI) while the Huawei MateView SE is not — you need to sit at least 94cm away for pixel-free viewing.
- Brightness: advantage MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED — Similar SDR brightness (250 vs 250 nits), but the MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED leads in HDR peak (1000 vs 600 nits).
Key Differences
| Specification | Huawei MateView SE | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 23.8" | 26.5" |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 | 3840×2160 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 93 | 166 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 94cm | 53cm |
| Refresh Rate | 75 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | 1000 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,500,000 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 80% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% |
| Year | 2022 | 2025 |
All specifications
| Specification | Huawei MateView SE 2022 | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 23.8" | 26.5" (Better) |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 | 3840×2160 (Better) |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 93 | 166 (Better) |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 94cm | 53cm (Better) |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 75 Hz | 240 Hz (Better) |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | FreeSync | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 0.0 ms GTG (Better) |
| HDR Certification | None | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| SDR Brightness | 250 nits | 250 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | 1000 nits (Better) |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,000 | 1:1,500,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | — | 98 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 90% · Adobe RGB 80% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 99% · Adobe RGB 97% (Better) |
| Year | 2022 | 2025 (Better) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: Huawei MateView SE or MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED?
The MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED has 166 PPI compared to 93 PPI for the Huawei MateView SE.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED requires 53cm vs 94cm for the Huawei MateView SE to reach retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Huawei MateView SE 2022 · 93 PPI · 23.8" · 75 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 2025 · 166 PPI · 26.5" · 240 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Huawei MateView SE 2022 · 93 PPI · 23.8" · 75 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 2025 · 166 PPI · 26.5" · 240 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: