Skip to content

Alienware AW3225QF 32" vs ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications

Alienware AW3225QF 32"

31.6" · 3840×2160 · QD-OLED
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm
Open in calculator →

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5" · 2560×1080 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 93cm
Open in calculator →
Specification Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM 2022
Screen Size 31.6" (Better) 29.5"
Resolution 3840×2160 (Better) 2560×1080
Pixel Density (PPI) 139 (Better) 94
Optimal Viewing Distance 63cm (Better) 93cm
Panel Type QD-OLED IPS
Viewing Angle 178° 178°
Aspect Ratio 16:9 21:9
Refresh Rate 240 Hz (Better) 220 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) G-SYNC Compatible FreeSync Premium
Response Time 0.0 ms GTG (Better) 1 ms GTG
HDR Certification DisplayHDR True Black 400 None
SDR Brightness 260 nits 300 nits (Better)
HDR Peak Brightness 1000 nits (Better) 300 nits
Contrast Ratio 1:1,000,000 (Better) 1:1,000
Ports 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub
USB-C Power Delivery 15 W
Color Gamut sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% · Adobe RGB 97% sRGB 110% (Better)
Year 2024 (Better) 2022

Summary

The Alienware AW3225QF 32" has higher pixel density (139 PPI), making it sharper at close range.

The Alienware AW3225QF 32" allows sitting closer (63cm) while maintaining retina quality.

The Alienware AW3225QF 32" offers a larger 31.6" display for more immersive viewing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better PPI: Alienware AW3225QF 32" or ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM?
The Alienware AW3225QF 32" has 139 PPI compared to 94 PPI for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM.
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
The Alienware AW3225QF 32" requires 63cm vs 93cm for the ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM to reach retina quality.

Methodology & Sources

Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.

Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.

Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).

Last updated:

Related Comparisons