ASUS ProArt PA32QCV vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"
Side-by-side comparison of viewing distance, PPI, and specifications
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"
27" · 5120×2880 · IPS
Optimal Viewing Distance 40cm
Open in calculator →
Category Ranking
Pixel Density (PPI)67in category
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV219 PPI #3
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"218 PPI #5
93 PPI224 PPI
HDR Peak Brightness67in category
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV600 nits #22
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"350 nits #61
250 nits2000 nits
DCI-P3 Color Gamut63in category
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV98% #31
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"100% #1
79%100%
Refresh Rate
ASUS ProArt PA32QCV60 Hz
Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"60 Hz
StandardHighUltra
Summary
- Sharpness: identical — Both screens are retina at 65cm. With nearly identical pixel density (219 vs 218 PPI), there is no visible difference in sharpness.
- Brightness: advantage ASUS ProArt PA32QCV — Similar SDR brightness (400 vs 350 nits), but the ASUS ProArt PA32QCV leads in HDR peak (600 vs 350 nits).
Key Differences
| Specification | ASUS ProArt PA32QCV | Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 6016×3384 | 5120×2880 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 219 | 218 |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG | 8 ms GTG |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits | 350 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | 350 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W | 90 W |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500 | 1:2,000 |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% |
All specifications
| Specification | ASUS ProArt PA32QCV 2025 | Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 31.5" (Better) | 27" |
| Resolution | 6016×3384 (Better) | 5120×2880 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 219 (Better) | 218 |
| Optimal Viewing Distance | 40cm | 40cm |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Viewing Angle | 178° | 178° |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | None | G-SYNC Compatible |
| Response Time | 5 ms GTG (Better) | 8 ms GTG |
| HDR Certification | DisplayHDR 600 | None |
| SDR Brightness | 400 nits (Better) | 350 nits |
| HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits (Better) | 350 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 1:1,500 | 1:2,000 (Better) |
| Ports | 1x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub | 2x HDMI · 1x DP · USB-C · USB Hub |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 96 W (Better) | 90 W |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 98% | sRGB 100% · DCI-P3 100% (Better) |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better PPI: ASUS ProArt PA32QCV or Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27"?
The ASUS ProArt PA32QCV has 219 PPI compared to 218 PPI for the Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27".
Which has a closer optimal viewing distance?
Both require 40cm for retina quality.
Related Comparisons
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs ASUS ProArt PA32QCV 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW2725DF 27" 2024 · 110 PPI · 26.7" · 360 Hz
vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs ASUS ProArt PA32QCV 2025 · 219 PPI · 31.5" · 60 Hz
Alienware AW3225QF 32" 2024 · 139 PPI · 31.6" · 240 Hz
vs Japannext JN-IPS275K-HSPC9 27" 2025 · 218 PPI · 27" · 60 Hz
Methodology & Sources
Formula: Retina distance (cm) = 3438 / PPI. Displayed values are rounded for readability.
Sources: Official manufacturer spec sheets and product pages. Specs are normalized before comparisons.
Comparison winners are calculated metric by metric (higher is better for most specs; lower is better for distance/response time).
Last updated: